In the Green Party antisemitism can be affirming

green_party_real_changeCross-posted on Engage.

Over the past several years Green Party members have proposed a number of motions and initiatives tackling antisemitism, all of which have been defeated or deformed beyond usefulness by anti-Zionists. As The Guardian’s Hugh Muir observed back in 2010, Green officialdom has long opted to brush concerns about antisemitism under the carpet. Below are the most recent fruits of that – a bit of background, a brief timeline of recent events, and finally why you’d be wrong to blame me for bringing this to light.

For a long time the Green Party has been racked by bitter, polemical campaigning against Israel which has crashed the boundaries of simple anti-Zionism. It has included calling Green Party members who defend Israel Nazi infiltrators, alleging that a non-Israeli member with a Jewish name was an Israeli agent, failing to react appropriately to antisemitic comments in a discussion of a “Zionist lobby“, saying that Israeli academics were “not part of the civilised world”, circulating material by David Duke and quasi journalists concerned about Jewish influence in Parliament, promoting material by Gilad Atzmon, objecting to Jews taking certain official positions, affiliating to the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Stop the War Coalition, and tending to treat concerns about antisemitism as politically motivated (and in fact worse than antisemitism itself).

A main channel for all this was internal Green Party email discussion groups, particularly the International List which discussed little else. Concerned members made several official complaints at the heart of which were failures by those assigned to moderate these groups. The complaints did not lead to any action, though. Some were rejected while others went into limbo. In contrast, a shockingly flimsy complaint against one member on a charge of disrepute and entryism on behalf of Israel progressed smartly to an internal tribunal (although the member, with help, managed to clear herself she has never been notified of the outcome). Members, including me, left, resigned their candidacy, or retreated into the background in protest about both the antisemitism and the ineptitude of the responses. The invective about Israel continued unabated. By some time in 2011 the International List moderator had had enough so it was decided to separate off the Israel-related stuff to the relative containment of a new discussion list called Palandisrl. The new list’s first moderator was someone who had referred to Israel as a “bloated state” with “US puppets in the UN”, and Zionism as “incompatible with Green views” and “an ancient theological fantasy”, so things went on in the same vein but with added moderator caprice. It quickly became an anti-Israel echo chamber where things could get quite surreal. When Terry Gallogly (Yorkshire & Humber Green Party) circulated a video of the 2012 Olympic logo morphing into the word ‘Zion’, an appalled member bypassed the moderator in favour of an email to then-leader Caroline Lucas. Lucas sent a quick, unambivalently sympathetic response but again as far as we know no further action was taken. At some stage Shahrar Ali (Brent Green Party and recently elected joint Deputy Leader) took over moderation.

That was some background – a brief timeline follows.

8 August – during Operation Protective Edge the discussion on the Palandisrl list became over-heated. Malcolm Chapman (Yorkshire & Humber Green Party) circulated a diatribe he had authored titled ‘GENOCIDE TODAY ~ A CALL TO BOYCOTT’. Soon afterwards it was published on the Y&H website (no link because it was taken down without explanation on 8 September). Interspersed with some trenchant criticism of Israel were references to a Holocaust “happening again”, “real terrorists” who “call their victims terrorists”, “deliberate targeting of civilians”, “influence over foreign governments”, “you have the memory of genocide in your DNA, why do you want to visit it upon others”, “why pretend any longer that your Palestinian Semite cousins have no right to their ancestral homeland”, and “all of Palestine must be freed from oppression”. More on why this is objectionable below.

14 August – I (a former member of Waltham Forest & Redbridge Green Party, who due to some bureaucratic error even now receives Palandisrl messages) emailed a request to Martin Deane and Shan Oakes (contacts for Y&H) to take down the piece, giving notice that otherwise I and others planned to make a complaint about antisemitism.

15 August – Martin Deane responded with a long defence but no undertakings, so our complaint was submitted. We took issue with the singularly hostile treatment of Israel, and the simplistic victim/perpetrator story which failed to recognise the role Hamas and the local jihadis in the conflict. We raised the matter of Holocaust inversion, an anti-Jewish propaganda tactic actively pursued by the far right, including Hamas. We pointed out the cruelty in referring to the Holocaust as a lesson Jews failed to learn. We observed that the mystified portrayal of the world’s sole Jewish state as a sinister, irresistible power resonates with the portrayal of Jews by people who hate Jews. We expressed discomfort with the racialised and tribal language of the piece. We objected to Malcolm Chapman’s failure to provide evidence for any of his claims, which made the Green Party look ignorant as well as prejudiced.

16 August – things got very much worse. Martin Deane posted an email to the  Palandisrl list including the sentence “At this time, to be accused of antisemitism here is a sign we’re probably doing something right”. This sentence crossed the line from shame and denial of antisemitism, to owning antisemitism. A conscientious, responsible moderator would have quickly intervened, but instead nobody intervened.

17 August – I emailed Shahrar Ali as Palandisrl moderator, reminding him of the need for scrupulous moderation on that list, warning that I would publish the events and offering him a chance to respond. He did not respond, nor did anybody on his behalf. I’ve waited a month.

6 September – at the Green Party Autumn Conference Shahrar Ali was elected male deputy leader of the Green Party.

8 September – the ‘GENOCIDE TODAY’ piece was quietly taken down. Since the Green Party has not responded to our complaint about the piece, the reasons for this are unclear. However we do know that somebody had a ‘quiet word’.

12 September – on the Palandisrl list, former Green Party male speaker and newly elected International Coordinator Derek Wall announced that Shahrar Ali would be stepping down as moderator and invited volunteers to replace him. When Martin Deane volunteered Derek Wall, who is himself energetically anti-Zionist, responded that he would be “very happy” for him to take the role.

Perhaps at this stage you’re inclined to shrug – after all, this kind of talk is normal now. But it shouldn’t be because it lowers resistance to antisemitism when what we need to do is make antisemitism strange. Perhaps you’re thinking that I am trying to create a diversion from criticism of Israel. But Greens Engage has always drawn attention to criticism of Israel. Perhaps you’re of the opinion that the Greens’ creation of the Palandisrl list was a principled measure of containment and damage limitation, a sort of pre-moderation in itself. But the Green Party was aware of antisemitism from these quarters, has taken a policy stand against it, and therefore has a responsibility to keep things clean under that stone. Perhaps you’re wondering why I didn’t pursue the ‘quiet word’ approach – the offending piece is gone now, after all. The reason I wasn’t prepared to pursue the matter informally and discreetly through an intermediary is because I consider that approach ultimately unsustainable, not to mention disempowering for members without these privileged connections to the inner circle of activists.

Perhaps you’re tempted to shoot the messenger or deny that anything antisemitic has or possibly could have happened in the Green Party, because the Green Party is the party of the good people. Yes, but Shahrar Ali – moderator of the step change when Martin Deane announced “At this time, to be accused of antisemitism here is a sign we’re probably doing something right” – is now a Deputy Leader of the Green Party. His conference speech was all about the need to fight discrimination. That anti-discrimination agenda needs to be honoured when it comes to Jews – including Zionist ones, and even when the attacks on them come from what seems to be pro-Palestine campaigning. And then there’s Martin Deane himself, selected to replace Shahrar Ali as moderator of a discussion about Palestine and Israel, a role for which he has shown himself to be inadequate. So this is not an anti-Green Party post and it’s not suggesting that antisemitism characterises the Green Party. This post has happened because there are no functioning official internal channels for redress on antisemitism.

As well as being frightening and wrong, antisemitism weakens both the Green Party and the cause of Palestinian emancipation. In this case I’m hoping that sunlight is the best disinfectant.

Advertisements

13 thoughts on “In the Green Party antisemitism can be affirming

  1. Andree Frieze

    As a both a Green Party supporter and member of Kingston Liberal Synagogu, I couldn’t agree with you more. In fact, I have written to Natalie Bennett about the anti-Israel policy adopted at conference (https://my.greenparty.org.uk/sites/my.greenparty.org.uk/files/Emergency%20Motion%20Israel.docx), which makes NO mention of Hamas in the recent conflict. She has not replied. I also highlighted its one-sidedness in the comment section on the website, and that still didn’t create any formal comeback or any comments from other members (https://my.greenparty.org.uk/news/results-conference-0).

    I am distressed by the Green Party’s stance on Israel. At a recent hustings for PCC when I said I flew to Israel every year because that’s where my family’s from, one member said ‘that’s two black marks – one for Israel (!) and one for flying.

    I would like to take the issue further. Shall we write a letter to the media (The Guardian/Independent) and see if Yachad and the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism will co-sign it. Or, ask if The Guardian wants a Comment is Free article about it?

    Thank you for highlighting this issue.

    Reply
    1. stolenandcontaminated

      I would like to be involved. Who do I get in touch With? I am also from Israel now a Londoner, and find this vehement anti Israel attitude very disconcerting. I support, the aims of the greens and have voted for them in the past. Given what you’ve reported I don’t think I could vote for them again, which leaves me no realistic option to vote for now 😦

      Reply
      1. Andree Frieze

        Thank you for getting in touch about this. I know how you feel about voting for them because of their view on Isreal/Palestine. It’s difficult for me as I’m standing as a candidate and it can be a vote loser! There are various groups who are trying to get the Israeli voice/pro-peace voice out there such as Pro Israel, Pro Palestine, Pro Peace – https://www.facebook.com/IsPalPeace?fref=ts, or there’s Yachad ( http://yachad.org.uk), One Voice (www.onevoicemovement.org) or there’s Stand with Us (http://www.standwithus.co.uk/). BTW my husband is Israeli.

        Reply
          1. Mira Vogel Post author

            I’ve tried to raise it with Benali Hamdache, joint Equality Coordinator. However it could do with being pursued through more official channels than those I used. I believe in general non-members are encouraged to get in touch to make their views known so no need to wait for a member. Sad to say that on antisemitism non-members may have more influence than members – particularly if the members are outside the Green inner circle.

          2. Andree Frieze

            Hi Jon I know this is too late for the election – I did get rather swamped the last few days, but I can tell the GP is aware of this video. It’s actually from 2009 and has been edited to appear worse than it is.

  2. Steve

    I joined the Green party because I believe in their green socialist agenda. But after going to my first meeting to hear about the Kurd’s all I got from the green party chairman and green members was it was all Israel’s fault for all the trouble in the middle East. I was disgusted and e-mail the local Green Party leader who just dismissed the anti Israel biased as nothing! The Greens will continue to lose members if they do not tackle anti Israel sentiment with in their party?

    Reply
  3. michelle shine

    I just want to say thank you for the work you are doing to highlight this very disturbing issue. I’ve always voted Green in the past, but now find myself in the position of needing to vote for the only party leader who has vehemently expressed friendship and support for both Israel and Jews, a party that for most of their other policies I seriously don’t believe in. Honestly, I never thought I’d see the day…

    Please let me know if there’s anything I can do to help.

    Reply
    1. Mira Vogel Post author

      Dear Michelle, thank you, but I would urge you not to mistake vocal support for Jews and Israel for actual material benefits. If you are supporting who I think you are supporting, I would strongly argue that their policies are bad for minority groups because they contribute to inequality, exacerbate splits between communities, and generally destablise society. I also think they are fairweather friends.

      We don’t want you not to vote Green, or to make this issue your most important issues – we want Greens to change.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s